| To: | Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] change format of LSM hooks |
| From: | Daniel Phillips <phillips@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Oct 2002 05:33:23 +0200 |
| Cc: | davem@xxxxxxxxxx, becker@xxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20021017114127.759e0e81.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |
| References: | <20021015194545.GC15864@kroah.com> <20021016000706.GI16966@kroah.com> <20021017114127.759e0e81.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Thursday 17 October 2002 03:41, Rusty Russell wrote:
> This also allows someone in the future to do:
>
> #define security_call(func, default_ret, ...) \
> ({ if (try_inc_mod_count(security_ops->owner))
> (security_ops->func(__VA_ARGS__));
> else
> (default_ret);
> })
Hopefully, dec_mod_count as well.
--
Daniel
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: FreeSWAN's pfkey_v2.c, Michael Richardson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] change format of LSM hooks, Rusty Russell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] change format of LSM hooks, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |