| To: | Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: sin6_scope_id |
| From: | Philip Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:00:41 +0000 |
| Cc: | lordbeatnik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | Message from Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@ISI.EDU> of "Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:32:07 PST." <xmsln5ouy6w.wl@orb.isi.edu> |
| References: | <200001140114.RAA31198@ns1.filetron.com> <xmsln5ouy6w.wl@orb.isi.edu> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
>BTW, in addition to introducing sin6_scope_id into kernel, >I think we should intorduce it into glibc functions. It causes not >less changes into kernel and glibc. >Is there anyone who is a developper of glibc in this mailing list ? Yes. I agree; it would be fairly futile to introduce sin6_scope_id into the kernel without having matching changes in glibc. p. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | sin6_scope_id patch for 2.3.39 (Re: sin6_scope_id), Hideaki YOSHIFUJI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | sk_buff question, Ilia Baldine |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: sin6_scope_id, Yuji Sekiya |
| Next by Thread: | Re: sin6_scope_id, Yuji Sekiya |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |