| To: | "Jason Lunz" <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: e1000 typo? |
| From: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:24:17 -0700 |
| Cc: | <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcNWvvrz6ZMxsjO8S528qn3AP1oZ3QACIglg |
| Thread-topic: | e1000 typo? |
> is that intentional? I don't think it changes the code > behavior, but it doesn't look right. It's intentional because && stops evaluating if left op is false which means we would leave Tx cleanup work when there was no Rx work. -scott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | e1000 typo?, Jason Lunz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: e1000 typo?, Jason Lunz |
| Previous by Thread: | e1000 typo?, Jason Lunz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: e1000 typo?, Jason Lunz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |