| To: | "Jim Keniston" <jkenisto@xxxxxxxxxx>, "LKML" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "netdev" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>, "Larry Kessler" <kessler@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Greg KH" <greg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Randy Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>, "Alan Cox" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [PATCH] Net device error logging, revised |
| From: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 16 Sep 2003 19:06:01 -0700 |
| Cc: | "David Brownell" <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcN73qqL6xcF06HFQk+v7BYiIraw8AA4GNpg |
| Thread-topic: | [PATCH] Net device error logging, revised |
> 3. A new macro, netdev_fatal, is included. Given the call > netdev_fatal(dev, HW, "NIC fried!\n"); > the indicated message is always logged: the msglevel arg (HW, in this > case) is NOT consulted. In fact, the msglevel arg to netdev_fatal > is ignored in this implementation. (As previously discussed, in some > future implementation, the msglevel could be logged to help indicate > the circumstances under which the event was logged.) I couldn't find the previous discussion on netdev_fatal, so sorry if this has already been worked out. It uses KERN_ERR; did you mean something stronger? If not, why not just use netdev_err(dev, ALL, "...")? What is the situation in the driver where we'd want to use _fatal? How do I know when to use _fatal and when to use _err? -scott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: ipt_physdev.c alignment problems on parisc64, David S. Miller |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] hamradio/scc -, Martijn Hijdra |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH] Net device error logging, revised, Jim Keniston |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Net device error logging, revised, Jim Keniston |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |