| To: | <rwhron@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: 82540EM very slow on 2.6.0-test[45] |
| From: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:28:56 -0700 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcN389yudSU7lsX6RBy95YtoMGl/TgABmeOw |
| Thread-topic: | 82540EM very slow on 2.6.0-test[45] |
> ftp'ing a multi-megabyte file gives about 16-20k/second > throughput. I first noticed this on 2.6.0-test4, but > the slowness may have existed longer. The destination > machine was running Solaris 8. Linux -> Solaris > This is a dual boot Dell P4. XP is about 1000x faster for > an ftp xfer, so the network seems okay. Is this Linux -> XP or XP -> Solaris? Trying to eliminate one player. What about Linux -> Linux? Is that slow? > dmesg shows "e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full > Duplex". Here is the full dmesg log: This feels like a duplex mis-match. Do you have good cat 5 cables? Are you using the same cable for the different tests? -scott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 82540EM very slow on 2.6.0-test[45], rwhron |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: 82540EM very slow on 2.6.0-test[45], rwhron |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 82540EM very slow on 2.6.0-test[45], Florian Zwoch |
| Next by Thread: | RE: 82540EM very slow on 2.6.0-test[45], rwhron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |