netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)

To: "Dave Hansen" <haveblue@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)
From: "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 11:56:03 -0700
Cc: "Herman Dierks" <hdierks@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ltd@xxxxxxxxx>, "Anton Blanchard" <anton@xxxxxxxxx>, <dwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nancy J Milliner" <milliner@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ricardo C Gonzalez" <ricardoz@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Brian Twichell" <twichell@xxxxxxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcM0NZhCXHVlgXspR9CtCHUR7FqVhgAAfjpQ
Thread-topic: e1000 performance hack for ppc64 (Power4)
> Scott, would you be pleased if something was implemented out 
> of the driver, in generic net code?  Something that all the 
> drivers could use, even if nothing but e1000 used it for now.

I suppose the driver could unconditionally call something like
skb_realign_for_broken_hw, which is a nop on non-broken archs, but would
it make more sense to not have the driver mess with the skb at all?

-scott


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>