| To: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes] |
| From: | "Feldman, Scott" <scott.feldman@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:22:15 -0800 |
| Cc: | Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Lunz <lunz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> > Just curious, why give priority to Tx over Rx? > > TX frees skbs, RX allocates skbs. > > You lessen the chance of allocation failure or "additional > work" being performed by the allocator when you do it in this order. At the expense of Rx latency. I suppose the best would be: rx_clean tx_clean rx_alloc -scott |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes], Jeff Garzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] IPSec: Use of "sizeof" for header sizes, part II, Tom Lendacky |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes], Robert Olsson |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Fwd: [E1000] NAPI re-insertion w/ changes], Feldman, Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |