netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC

from [Eble, Dan] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "'Krzysztof Halasa'" <khc@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC
From: "Eble, Dan" <DanE@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:24:26 -0400
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> I wonder if we could merge IF_PROTO_FR_(ADD|DEL)_* and 
> IF_PROTO_CISCO_*?
> It would get us the same sethdlc syntax and similar add/del code.
> -- 
> Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH

Are you sure that is a good idea?  Using separate numbers for Cisco and FR
is a safeguard against unwittingly creating an FR PVC with "sethdlc cisco
proto ether ... ".  Or are you suggesting to merge the sethdlc syntax too?
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [NAT-T] NON-IKE encapsulation, Herbert Xu
Next by Date:  Re: fib_hash.c:fn_hash(), Jeff Garzik
Previous by Thread:  Re: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC, Krzysztof Halasa
Next by Thread:  Re: [FYI PATCH] Ethernet over Cisco HDLC, Krzysztof Halasa
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]