| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RFC 1323 |
| From: | "R Harper" <rharper333@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 04 Apr 2005 18:17:40 +0200 |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello I have been taking a look at the timestamp feature in RFC 1323. My question is how are the TSval and TSecr fields represented in the current implementation of linux, e.g. that is the resolution of the timers. Is the format simply timeval.tv_sec from the time.h or is timeval.tv_usec also mixed into the timestamp. (If someone would point to where in the code this is defined) Another question, as I understand the RFC, the timestamp are only relevant to the box generating them. Are TCP implementation different in how the TSval data is represented? Is it possible to make use of the timestamp in an intermediate box, e.g. estimating RTT in a box that a TCP connection passes? I someone has the time to answer these question, it would be great. with regards r.harper _________________________________________________________________ Undgå pop-ups med MSN Toolbar - http://toolbar.msn.dk/ hent den gratis! |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4441] New: unregister_netdevice Prompt and system shell lookup when trying to shutdown vlan, Ganesh Venkatesan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH bridge-2.6.11] bridge hub_enabled option, Alpt |
| Previous by Thread: | Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4441] New: unregister_netdevice Prompt and system shell lookup when trying to shutdown vlan, Andrew Morton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC 1323, rick jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |