| To: | "Catalin\(ux aka Dino\) BOIE" <util@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
| From: | "Steve Iribarne" <steve.iribarne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Mar 2005 06:35:43 -0800 |
| Cc: | <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Henrik Nordstrom" <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Martin Mares" <mj@xxxxxx>, "Zdenek Radouch" <zdenek@xxxxxxx>, "Eran Mann" <emann@xxxxxxx>, "Thomas Graf" <tgraf@xxxxxxx>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@xxxxxx>, <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <linux-net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcUlPU9way76hMQGQ9ydMG3kXOS5TwAQPNcw |
| Thread-topic: | Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing) |
-> You say that a client will not allow you to use net 10. -> OK, but, the same client would not allow you to use 127/8 because they -> use -> it! -> What I'm saying is that 10.0.0.0/8 and 127.0.0.0/8 are the same. The -> customer can use them. -> You assume that the client will not use 127/8. Why? This is wrong. -> You can use it, the client can use it. -> No. If the client uses 127/8 on a linux box, it is just a loopback and will never go out on the wire and the applications (i.e. telnet, ftp, ping, whatever) will just loopback. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: netif_rx packet dumping, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Re[2]: [leo@yuriev.ru: [PATCH] ethernet-bridge: update skb->priority in case forwarded frame has VLAN-header], jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Jason Lunz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Do you know the TCP stack? (127.x.x.x routing), Dmitry Torokhov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |