| To: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mm kernel oops with r8169 & named, PREEMPT |
| From: | Danny <dannydaemonic@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:44:02 -0700 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041013181840.GA30852@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> |
| References: | <9625752b041012230068619e68@mail.gmail.com> <9625752b041013091772e26739@mail.gmail.com> <9625752b04101309182a96fbd2@mail.gmail.com> <200410131129.05657.jdmason@us.ltcfwd.linux.ibm.com> <20041013181840.GA30852@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> |
| Reply-to: | Danny <dannydaemonic@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:18:40 +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > Danny, can your drop the r8169 driver from 2.6.9-rc4-mm1 into vanilla > 2.6.9-rc4 and confirm that it works (preempt should not matter) ? I see how the timing on the installation of the r8169 could have just been bad. Since preempt shouldn't matter, I'm going to test that and acpi etc first (because it's easier to test heh). See, well, I'm going to need reiser4 for the vanilla. I found patches here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.9-rc4/2.6.9-rc4-mm1/broken-out/ But can someone point out which patches I will need? Do I only need reiser4-only.patch or is it safer for my fs if I have all the other reiser4 patches? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: mm kernel oops with r8169 & named, PREEMPT, Danny |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] work around 5701 misalignment, Jeff Garzik |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mm kernel oops with r8169 & named, PREEMPT, Francois Romieu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mm kernel oops with r8169 & named, PREEMPT, Danny |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |