| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Intel and TOE in the news |
| From: | rick jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:45:02 -0800 |
| In-reply-to: | <m1psywb8i4.fsf@muc.de> |
| References: | <4216B62D.6000502@pobox.com> <20050219041007.GA17896@xi.wantstofly.org> <20050219114624.373af63f.davem@davemloft.net> <m1psywb8i4.fsf@muc.de> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
<speculating freely> With all the interrupt avoidance that is going-on these days, would prefetching in the driver be sufficient? Presumably the driver is going to be processing multiple packets at a time on an interrupt/etc so having it issue prefetches in SW would seem to help with all but the very first packet. rick jones Wisdom teeth are impacted, people are affected by the effects of events |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] r8169: code clean-up, Jon Mason |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Massvie problems with 3000 sockets, Christian Schmid |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Intel and TOE in the news, jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Intel and TOE in the news, Michael Richardson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |