| To: | jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [fw@deneb.enyo.de: Route cache performance under stress] |
| From: | Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 06 Apr 2003 18:42:11 +0200 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20030406110728.G68419@shell.cyberus.ca> (jamal's message of "Sun, 6 Apr 2003 11:14:50 -0400 (EDT)") |
| References: | <20030405165016.GA32361@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20030405134350.N68419@shell.cyberus.ca> <873ckwftal.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <20030405180607.P68419@shell.cyberus.ca> <87n0j3ltf0.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <20030406110728.G68419@shell.cyberus.ca> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) |
jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > cat /proc/net/rt_cache_stat > Should give us a lot more info. I'll try to obtain the data points you requested. >> > Our data was collected on a real ISP which hosts a lot of web >> > servers and was being constantly DOSed. I dont think you can get >> > more real world than that. >> >> Did you look at a router, or at a host? > > As a router, but the hash compute shouldnt matter. Slow path ist faster on hosts than on routers which substantial routing tables, isn't it? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] skb_headlen() cleanup, James Morris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [fw@deneb.enyo.de: Route cache performance under stress], Robert Olsson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [fw@deneb.enyo.de: Route cache performance under stress], jamal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [fw@deneb.enyo.de: Route cache performance under stress], Robert Olsson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |