| To: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Netlink send from the interrupt context |
| From: | Robert Iakobashvili <coroberti@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2005 13:16:54 +0200 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Eab0v2DeJzltKV+i+vHCCIBB0AVmpKpWGcec67FM/7wFmUl2rZMNmTbCNWRr+B298xbht1xVgROjalnws/hMX3ASw9Ww3uqqc1X+9/rX/X6cxiAcTdrbaOMm3hmx06L9DOJjAnMOqS0ntSdwYJeiVPr0z4AU5osbukR1vSOSMxY= |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Are there netlink socket netlink_unicast () and netlink_broadcast () interrupt safe? If not, where is the problem and the direction to make them safe? If it is not easy, what could be a workaroud? Thank you in advance. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Iakobashvili - NAVIGARE NECESSE EST coroberti at gmail dot com --------------------------------------------------------------- |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | TCPXM, Alan Menegotto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ip_conntrack: Make "hashsize" conntrack parameter writable, Jesper Dangaard Brouer |
| Previous by Thread: | TCPXM, Alan Menegotto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ip_conntrack: Make "hashsize" conntrack parameter writable, Jesper Dangaard Brouer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |