netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

BUG: HTB?

To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: BUG: HTB?
From: Asim Shankar <asimshankar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:21:07 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=DCovcoWISgmTCBrZWiABUOF8qaRgwIMT16y61yz5p29vUOCFeBnmJCUefbgPjBxvKVFrACp+J8FKgfAbi9mrH+rHxpSXw2xrLThREzU+t594/18z3/r3NYjTOaj+WUwQXAU4yINE0lb8IDfPJFEv5CR2tkXrxqHjNWUW2P7FV18=
Reply-to: Asim Shankar <asimshankar@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

I think there is a bug in htb_enqueue() (net/sched/sch_htb.c)

Specifically, in the lines:
if (cl == HTB_DIRECT) {
        /* enqueue to helper queue */
        if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
                __skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
                q->direct_pkts++;
        }
}

If a packet is classified as HTB_DIRECT but the direct_queue is
already full, then the packet doesn't get enqueued but sch->q.qlen++
will happen a few lines later. Overflowing of the direct_queue
probably rarely happens in practice, but I was playing around and
noticed it happen in some corner cases of my testing.

Should the packet be dropped instead? Like:

if (cl == HTB_DIRECT) {
        /* enqueue to helper queue */
        if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
                __skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
                q->direct_pkts++;
        } else {
               sch->qstats.drops++;
                kfree_skb(skb);
                return NET_XMIT_DROP;
       }
}


Thanks,

-- Asim


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>