| To: | sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: netif_rx_schedule_prep() returning false? |
| From: | Asim Shankar <asimshankar@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Feb 2005 14:41:59 -0600 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Y9J+1oLMbmvqR7hu9Bf+6qobqdmVANvgM4sjueXI9xtIIMQPduRgEU1cX+ez0GMVjtGBIkH9554uZbpmbl2u74Dg7kOfR4egonhLDOj9Iv8P7hXfu4WsW7f8s3uLkI5eyCoqOL/Atf5TJGW2G/mQkIxIi+Hx16rhnlwBtiA77W4= |
| In-reply-to: | <1107371791.3366.126.camel@sfeldma-mobl.dsl-verizon.net> |
| References: | <7bca1cb5050202100475279073@mail.gmail.com> <1107371791.3366.126.camel@sfeldma-mobl.dsl-verizon.net> |
| Reply-to: | Asim Shankar <asimshankar@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
> I'm running the same setup with delays turned off and I'm not seeing > what you're seeing. What e1000 controller are you using? Send lspci > -n. lspci -n: 00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:7190 (rev 03) 00:01.0 Class 0604: 8086:7191 (rev 03) 00:07.0 Class 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 02) 00:07.1 Class 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01) 00:07.2 Class 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01) 00:07.3 Class 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 02) 00:10.0 Class 0200: 8086:1076 00:11.0 Class 0200: 10b7:9055 00:13.0 Class 0604: 1011:0024 (rev 03) 01:00.0 Class 0300: 10de:0028 (rev 11) This happens when a more "powerful" machine sends to a less powerful one and not the reverse. My setup is so: Machine A: Dual Xeon 2.8Ghz, 1GB RAM Dell PowerEdge 1800 Machine B: Dual P-III 500Mhz, 512MB RAM, old Dell Precision 410 I'm using netperf, so B is running a "netserver" and the netperf client application is started on A. "lspci" shown above is from "B". When reversed, B sending TO A, then machine A doesn't complain at all. Machine A also has the same card: Intel PRO/1000 MT Desktop Adapter - Class 0200: 8086:1076. Thanks, Regards, -- Asim P.S. Changes to e1000_intr() in order to check this: o Added "int rx_sched = test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &netdev->state); o Later, added an "else" to the "if (likely(netif_rx_schedule_prep(nedev))" block where I do a printk() |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-rc2 1/2] wireless: Clean up firmware loading in Atmel driver, Simon Kelley |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] PKT_SCHED: Fix ingress qdisc to pick up IPv6 packets when using netfilter hooks, David S. Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: netif_rx_schedule_prep() returning false?, Scott Feldman |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 3/20] net/8139too: remove interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() usage, Nishanth Aravamudan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |