netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: e1000 netpoll tweak

To: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] netpoll: e1000 netpoll tweak
From: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:02:03 -0700
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ak@xxxxxxx, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxx, john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=j9Y4zaH3tuqvsKq8UlqKui8vqA6OzVdpJf2viXg2FEJ5YkeZyyq8X+V5wa2Dync3BjgKiUhbbo1qqCFATHLhKfePYuV8JrSvvpzevpuJP9VwU+1AO3MD+ALGb7oV7PgoM4T7DnAMHLp/OiEoEyy0WGQyKb2qmAR9bgZzDmyM4Tg=
In-reply-to: <4.502409567@selenic.com>
References: <3.502409567@selenic.com> <4.502409567@selenic.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sorry this reply was to go to the whole list but only made it to Matt.

The e1000_intr() routine already calls e1000_clean_tx_irq().  So
what's the point of this patch?  Am I missing something?

On 8/11/05, Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Suggested by Steven Rostedt, matches his patch included in e100.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Index: l/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> ===================================================================
> --- l.orig/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c       2005-08-06 17:36:32.000000000 
> -0500
> +++ l/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c    2005-08-06 17:55:01.000000000 -0500
> @@ -3789,6 +3789,7 @@ e1000_netpoll(struct net_device *netdev)
>         struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
>         disable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq);
>         e1000_intr(adapter->pdev->irq, netdev, NULL);
> +       e1000_clean_tx_irq(adapter);
>         enable_irq(adapter->pdev->irq);
>  }
>  #endif
> 
> 


-- 
Cheers,
John


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>