| To: | Horst von Brand <vonbrand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets |
| From: | Lincoln Dale <ltd@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:28:15 +1000 |
| Cc: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200206121211.g5CCBjZt030139@pincoya.inf.utfsm.cl> |
| References: | <Message from Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> <3D06E9A0.5060801@candelatech.com> |
| Sender: | owner-netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
At 08:11 AM 12/06/2002 -0400, Horst von Brand wrote:
General dislike for adding features of _extremely_ limited (debugging!) use? i would imagine that every installation of Squid on linux is interested in having _realistic transaction logs_ of exactly how much data was received and transmitted on a TCP connection. i know of many many folk who use transaction logs from HTTP caches for volume-based billing. right now, those bills are anywhere between 10% to 25% incorrect. you call that "extremely limited"? of course, i am doing exactly what Dave said to do -- maintaining my own out-of-kernel patch -- but its a pain, i'm sure it will soon conflict with stuff and is a damn shame - it isn't much code, but Dave seems pretty steadfast that he isn't interested. damn shame that. i think the information is on par with getsockopt(..,TCP_INFO,..) in terms of usefulness yet TCP_INFO is there in the kernel.
lincoln. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Horst von Brand |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, Horst von Brand |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |