netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706

from [Jeff Garzik] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S.Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:01:23 -0400
Cc: mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, ffan@xxxxxxxxxxxx, lusinsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050520.164504.31639000.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20050520194220.GA18259@havoc.gtf.org> <20050520.152836.48528379.davem@davemloft.net> <428E72F9.3070404@pobox.com> <20050520.164504.31639000.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050328 Fedora/1.7.6-1.2.5
David S.Miller wrote: 
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 19:30:01 -0400


Sure. What I'm driving at is that a checksum of zero seems to imply CHECKSUM_NONE not CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY. tg3 only does the 0xffff check.


Sure, both ways are fine.

huh? They are pretty different... one says "Checksum all good, dude" and the other says "I didn't checksum, do it in software for me."

right?

        Jeff



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706, Michael Chan
Previous by Thread:  Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: A new driver for Broadcom bcm5706, Michael Chan
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]