netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Mystery packet killing tg3

from [Rick Jones] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Peter Buckingham <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Mystery packet killing tg3
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 10:32:16 -0700
Cc: jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <427A5363.2080703@pantasys.com>
References: <20050502162405.65dfb4a9@localhost.localdomain> <20050502200251.38271b61.davem@davemloft.net> <m14qdiyhcn.fsf@muc.de> <42791825.2080204@pantasys.com> <20050505114327.GA51761@muc.de> <427A5363.2080703@pantasys.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; HP-UX 9000/785; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040304
Peter Buckingham wrote: 
Andi Kleen wrote:

"32bit e1000"? How did you get such a beast? AFAIK all e1000s are 64bit
address capable. Please supply a full boot log without iommu=force and describe what happens exactly.


that was my initial impression too :-(

IIRC the HP Itanium2 workstations (zx2000, zx6000) have a 32-bit Intel (e1000) GbE on them. I have an idea what the name of the chip was, but will defer to any and all Intel types on the list :)

rick jones


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Mystery packet killing tg3, Peter Buckingham
Next by Date:  Re: Mystery packet killing tg3, Peter Buckingham
Previous by Thread:  Re: Mystery packet killing tg3, Peter Buckingham
Next by Thread:  Re: Mystery packet killing tg3, Peter Buckingham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]