| To: | Hasso Tepper <hasso@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: icmp_unreachable uses wrong ip |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 02 May 2005 16:52:06 +0200 |
| Cc: | "J. Simonetti" <jeroens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <200505021659.05674.hasso@estpak.ee> |
| References: | <1115040079.5620.11.camel@jeroens.office.netland.nl> <200505021659.05674.hasso@estpak.ee> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050420 Debian/1.7.7-2 |
Hasso Tepper wrote: > Similar patches have been posted to the list repeatedly AFAIK with no any > response from developers. Can someone enlighten us why? Is there something > wrong with it? This is the feature people administrating routers would like > to have. It makes debugging complicated topologies much easier and all > routers I have seen behave this way. Why can't you simply add the prefered source address to the route? Regards Patrick |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Tulip interrupt uses non IRQ safe spinlock, Paulo Marques |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: patch: Action repeat, Thomas Graf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: icmp_unreachable uses wrong ip, Hasso Tepper |
| Next by Thread: | Re: icmp_unreachable uses wrong ip, Hasso Tepper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |