netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: FIB alternative fib_hash2.c

from [Andre Tomt] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FIB alternative fib_hash2.c
From: Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:31:00 +0200
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <16991.54602.218744.163816@robur.slu.se>
References: <16991.54602.218744.163816@robur.slu.se>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
Robert Olsson wrote: 
Hello!

Don't like to sit on this... originally an experiment to understand what we
can expect from FIB lookup in the linux context. Beginning to think it might be useful as is... memory is cheap. With full bgp and rDoS I see around
double FIB lookup performance. No-one has been brave enough to test it....
Patch is for 2.6.11 and includes an Kconfig option different FIB alternatives.

Drool. Got some numbers? pps - flows - memory use, on what hardware, that sort of thing.

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re : [Prism54-devel] Question on prism54 driver, Jean Tourrilhes
Next by Date:  Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/net/wan/: possible cleanups, Alan Cox
Previous by Thread:  FIB alternative fib_hash2.c, Robert Olsson
Next by Thread:  Re: FIB alternative fib_hash2.c, Robert Olsson
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]