netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Checking SPI in xfrm_state_find

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Checking SPI in xfrm_state_find
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 19:00:36 +0200
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050331004658.GA26395@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20050214221006.GA18415@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050214221200.GA18465@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050214221433.GB18465@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050214221607.GC18465@gondor.apana.org.au> <424864CE.5060802@trash.net> <20050328233917.GB15369@gondor.apana.org.au> <424B40C2.90304@trash.net> <20050331004658.GA26395@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050324 Debian/1.7.6-1
Herbert Xu wrote:
It just occured to me that it would be much simpler if you did the
existence check in the first loop.

So something like

                if (x->props.family != family ||
                    !xfrm_state_addr_check(x, daddr, saddr, family) ||
                    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto)
                        continue;
                if (tmpl->id.spi) {
                        if (tmpl->id.spi != x->id.spi)
                                continue;
                        error = -EEXIST;
                }
                if (x->props.reqid == tmpl->reqid &&
                    tmpl->mode == x->props.mode) {
                }

You're right, sorry for getting back to you so late. But since its already in now and not very important, I'm going to leave it until I have a better reason to touch that code, if you're ok with that.

Regards
Patrick

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Checking SPI in xfrm_state_find, Patrick McHardy <=