| To: | hadi@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 03 Apr 2005 17:52:26 +0200 |
| Cc: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Masahide NAKAMURA <nakam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ipsec-tools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx>, jmorris@xxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1112478168.1088.337.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| References: | <1112405144.1096.33.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20050402140019.GA13017@yakov.inr.ac.ru> <1112478168.1088.337.camel@jzny.localdomain> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050324 Debian/1.7.6-1 |
jamal wrote:
Herbert also mentions something along the same lines in his email. This would make a lot of sense!
What would be a good code to return when you queue the packet?
Regards Patrick |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: take 2 WAS(Re: PATCH: IPSEC xfrm events, Patrick McHardy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [IPSEC]: Protect against BHs in xfrm_user_policy(), Patrick McHardy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire, Aidas Kasparas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |