| To: | Ludo Stellingwerff <ludo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [22/*] [NETFILTER] Use correct IPsec MTU in TCPMSS |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:22:34 +0100 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <423DBCCE.8090006@protactive.nl> |
| References: | <20050314102614.GA9610@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050314105313.GA21001@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050314111002.GA29156@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050315091904.GA6256@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050315095837.GA7130@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050318090310.GA28443@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050318091129.GA28658@gondor.apana.org.au> <20050318104013.57d65e99.davem@davemloft.net> <423D9ADA.6050407@trash.net> <423DA58D.4050406@protactive.nl> <20050320171707.GE4201@xi.wantstofly.org> <423DB7B7.1070604@trash.net> <423DBCCE.8090006@protactive.nl> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050106 Debian/1.7.5-1 |
Ludo Stellingwerff wrote:
I'm hoping that using the fwmark as a selector can provide a workable solution for both mine and Lennert's problem, any many more related situations. Netfilter has a (almost) complete range of selectors. e.g. Lennerts problem could be solved using a combination of the "realm" match of iptables, in combination with a fwmark for SPD matching.
Regards Patrick |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [22/*] [NETFILTER] Use correct IPsec MTU in TCPMSS, Ludo Stellingwerff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: dummy as IMQ replacement, jamal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [22/*] [NETFILTER] Use correct IPsec MTU in TCPMSS, Ludo Stellingwerff |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [22/*] [NETFILTER] Use correct IPsec MTU in TCPMSS, jamal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |