netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch 05/13] remove last_rx update from loopback device

To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch 05/13] remove last_rx update from loopback device
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:23:25 -0800
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, christoph@xxxxxxxxxx, nirajk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, christoph@xxxxxxxxxxx, Shai@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <42378617.3080600@hp.com>
References: <200503152222.j2FMMbhG016805@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <423764A3.8030201@pobox.com> <20050315150809.579c5e85.akpm@osdl.org> <20050315165345.735573de.davem@davemloft.net> <42378617.3080600@hp.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
Rick Jones wrote:

These loopback driver SMP optimizations are starting to really
driver me crazy.


Correct or not, I suspect there are a non-trivial number of folks out there who use loopback performance as an indicator of over the network performance or at least of stack path length (less driver).

I hope not the former. Given that loopback performance is *significantly* faster than network performance, increasing the performance of the loopback driver in these somewhat artificial ways (that differ from the real network device path) simply *increases* the inaccuracy of their testing and the conclusions they can draw from it ;).

thanks,
Nivedita


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>