On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:52:16PM +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Since the tunnel dst is not necessarily the last in the bundle anymore,
we might miss to initialize some dsts, for example with ipcomp/tunnel +
esp/transport. If we have nested tunnels we'll fiddle with entries in
the routing cache.
Sorry, but I don't get it :) First of all what do you mean by the
tunnel dst?
If you mean &rt->u.dst then as far as I can see it's still the last
child in the bundle. It may also appear in ->route elements earlier
on but that does not come into play in this loop.