netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!!

from [Christian Schmid] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!!
From: Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:10:53 +0100
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050221213610.GC26248@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
References: <421A3EB8.4050607@rapidforum.com> <20050221202854.GA26248@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <421A45CA.80001@rapidforum.com> <20050221205606.GB26248@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <421A4FFA.7090003@rapidforum.com> <20050221213610.GC26248@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817
Francois Romieu wrote: 
Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :

I started it after one break-cyclus and stopped it immedately after the next break-cyclus ended. 


I'd welcome several cycles to feed the data through gnuplot.
A sample based on 15 minutes or more would not hurt: I speak perl too.


Hm I have already restarted the server. There is no other way to make this 
behaviour go away....

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: Intel and TOE in the news, Thomas Graf
Next by Date:  Re: Intel and TOE in the news, Stephen Hemminger
Previous by Thread:  Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!!, Francois Romieu
Next by Thread:  Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!!, Christian Schmid
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]