| To: | Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few |
| From: | Christian Schmid <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:17:16 +0100 |
| Cc: | bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>, Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050221120223.GA30348@xi.wantstofly.org> |
| References: | <421925DB.2060602@rapidforum.com> <42192AAF.8020609@us.ibm.com> <42192CD5.5090401@rapidforum.com> <20050221090121.GA7478@outpost.ds9a.nl> <4219B99E.1000603@rapidforum.com> <20050221120223.GA30348@xi.wantstofly.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040817 |
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 11:36:14AM +0100, Christian Schmid wrote: Because thats the first I excluded. I changed the program by replacing sendfile with a caching-routine plus syswrite. And it was really interesting that the syswrite was the one which needs most of the real-time, not the caching-routine. syswrite blocked 100 ms per socket.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Intel and TOE in the news, jamal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, bert hubert |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, Lennert Buytenhek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: many outgoing tcp sockets are slower than a few, bert hubert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |