| To: | Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 12 Feb 2005 13:27:50 -0800 |
| Cc: | rick jones <rick.jones2@xxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, hubert.tonneau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20050212205617.GA29146@yakov.inr.ac.ru> |
| References: | <0525M9211@server5.heliogroup.fr> <420D37A3.6020209@hp.com> <20050211170958.17fcde21.davem@davemloft.net> <20050212143105.GB27456@yakov.inr.ac.ru> <86de38db09518ced8865af09cd79c064@hp.com> <20050212205617.GA29146@yakov.inr.ac.ru> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 |
Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: If receiver sent an ACK it still does not mean that sender used it to increase its cwnd. Particularly, small packet exchange definitely does not inflate cwnd.
thanks, Nivedita |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/4] [NETLINK] introduce netlink_check_skb function, Pablo Neira |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, Alexey Kuznetsov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.10 TCP troubles -- suggested patch, rick jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |