Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 08:23:47PM -0800, Bukie Mabayoje wrote:
> > Scott Feldman wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 09:18, David HÃ¤rdeman wrote:
> > > > I experience the same problems as reported by Michael Gernoth when
> > > > sending a WOL-packet to computer with a e100 NIC which is already
> > > > powered on.
> > >
> > > I didn't look at the 2.4 case, but for 2.6, it seems e100 was enabling
> > > PME wakeup during probe. PME shouldn't be enabled while the system is
> > > up. I suspect the assertion of PME while the system is up is what's
> > > causing problems. This patch moves PME wakeup enabling to either
> > > suspend or shutdown.
> > >
> > > David, would you give this patch a try? Make sure the system still
> > > wakes from a magic packet if suspended or shut down, and doesn't cause
> > > kacpid to go crazy if system is running. If it helps for 2.6, perhaps
> > > someone can look into 2.4 to see if there is something similar going on
> > This issue was reported on 2.4.
> Can any of you guys test v2.6, please?
I will be glad to test it now but I can't, I am currently doing some work on
2.4. If no one has tested it in the next few days I will validate it then.
By the way, do anyone have an idea how to get this functionality into 2.4
eepro100. The problem is that eepro100 code works on a non WOL cards.
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/