Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>]

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / $B5HF#1QL@ wrote:

> In article <E1CvSuS-00056x-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:11:32 
> +1100), Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says:
>
>
> > Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, final decision: you are right :) conntrack also defragments locally
> > > generated packets before they hit ip_fragment. In this case the fragments
> > > have skb->dst set.
> > Well caught.  The same thing is needed for IPv6, right?
>
> (not yet confirmed, but) yes, please.
We don't need this for IPv6 yet. Once we get nf_conntrack in we
might need this, but its IPv6 fragment handling is different from
ip_conntrack, I need to check first.

Regards
Patrick