Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter

To:	Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:49:01 +0100
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, snort2004@xxxxxxx, rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxx, bridge@xxxxxxxx, Martin Josefsson <gandalf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, shemminger@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1106730510.4041.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<1131604877.20041218092730@mail.ru.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <p73zn0ccaee.fsf@verdi.suse.de> <1105117559.11753.34.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <20050107100017.454ddadc@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net> <1105133241.3375.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050118135735.4b77d38d.davem@davemloft.net> <1106433059.4486.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1106436153.20995.42.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> <1106484019.3376.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1106496509.1085.1.camel@tux.rsn.bth.se> <20050125220558.6e824f8a.davem@davemloft.net> <1106730510.4041.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Sender:	netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050106 Debian/1.7.5-1

Bart De Schuymer wrote:

Does anyone have objections to this patch, which reduces the netfilter
call chain length?

Looks fine to me.

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>

Regards
Patrick

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.., (continued) Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.., Stephen Hemminger Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.., David Woodhouse Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.., Bart De Schuymer Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.., David S. Miller [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..), Bart De Schuymer Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..), Martin Josefsson Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..), Bart De Schuymer Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..), Martin Josefsson Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..), David S. Miller Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..), Bart De Schuymer Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, Patrick McHardy <= Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, Patrick McHardy Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, Bart De Schuymer Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, Patrick McHardy Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, Patrick McHardy Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, Rusty Russell Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, David S. Miller Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, Rusty Russell

Previous by Date:	Re: [PATCH] gc_min_interval in milleseconds via /proc, David S. Miller
Next by Date:	Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 4111] New: invalid operand: 0000 at include/linux/netdevice.h:879, Andrew Morton
Previous by Thread:	Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (was: Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..), Bart De Schuymer
Next by Thread:	Re: [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter, David S. Miller
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]