Re: path: module replay

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>]

jamal wrote:

> Ok, here is the last patch. I think module replay should be done from
> that spot and to be consistent as well from cls_api.c for legacy stuff.
> I also fixed a module ref count leak. 
> the act_api piece is dependent on what i sent earlier for namsiz.
> the cls_api change i believe conflicts with what Thomas sent yesterday.
We have to replay all orders since we dropped the rtnl. An action
could have done __dev_get_by_* or something similar. Can you send
a single patch for the module refcount leak please ?

Regards
Patrick