netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: request_module while holding rtnl semaphore

To: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: request_module while holding rtnl semaphore
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:04:09 +0100
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041212175736.GA8493@postel.suug.ch>
References: <41899DCF.3050804@trash.net> <E1CQDcP-0003ff-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20041109161126.376f755c.davem@davemloft.net> <20041110010113.GJ31969@postel.suug.ch> <41916A91.3080107@trash.net> <20041110012251.GK31969@postel.suug.ch> <41916F0B.5010809@trash.net> <20041110013941.GL31969@postel.suug.ch> <41917330.6090002@trash.net> <20041212175736.GA8493@postel.suug.ch>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041008 Debian/1.7.3-5
Thomas Graf wrote:

I started working on a patchset to clean up all the error paths,
allow changing all pararmeters for those not supporting it yet
and to add the action bits for tcindex, route, and rsvp. Finishing
it and writing all the test cases to do proper testing will take some
time but I hope to have it ready for early 2.6.11 inclusion.

Just to let you know so we don't do redundant work.

Thanks for the information. Next thing I want to do is clean up the
init paths and add proper error propagation.

Regards
Patrick




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>