netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: via-rhine unable to send back-to-back packets?

from [Ben Greear] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: via-rhine unable to send back-to-back packets?
From: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:41:23 -0800
Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041130064823.GA27872@xi.wantstofly.org>
Organization: Candela Technologies
References: <20041129222700.GA22918@xi.wantstofly.org> <20041129172540.6b959858.davem@davemloft.net> <20041130064823.GA27872@xi.wantstofly.org>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041020 
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:

Yeah, preamble (8 bytes), CRC (4 bytes), inter-packet gap (12 bytes).

Perhaps the via-rhine simply can't send out packets back-to-back and
needs 14 byte times of inter-packet gap.  I couldn't find any stray +2
in the driver anywhere but I'm just checking.


Couldn't you just sniff the resulting traffic to see if it is too big?

Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] fix missing security_*() check in net/compat.c, Chris Wright
Next by Date:  [PATCH] pktgen: clear error count before each run, Scott Feldman
Previous by Thread:  Re: via-rhine unable to send back-to-back packets?, Lennert Buytenhek
Next by Thread:  Re: via-rhine unable to send back-to-back packets?, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]