netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [patch 10/13] net/socket.c::sys_bind() cleanup.

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch 10/13] net/socket.c::sys_bind() cleanup.
From: Luiz Fernando Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:55:10 -0200
Cc: akpm@xxxxxxxx, jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20041124002709.52cb8d1f.davem@davemloft.net>
Organization: Conectiva S/A
References: <200411220644.iAM6i8900672@mail.osdl.org> <20041124002709.52cb8d1f.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803)
David S. Miller wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:43:56 -0800
akpm@xxxxxxxx wrote:


From: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

net/socket.c::sys_bind() is a bit complex function, the patch below makes
it more clear.

Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>


This was commented on to be buggy, or at least change behavior.
The "if (err >= 0)" tests were changed to flat "if (err)" tests.

It doesn't a buggy or change behaivor.

 What happens here is that move_addr_to_kernel() returns 0
success and -EINVAL or -EFAULT on error. Thus, change from
"if (err >= 0)" to "if (err)" is safe.

 Also, it was discussed and ACK'ed by James Morris:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/16/339

 The real problem here I've made a bad patch
description. I'll try to make it better next time.

 thanks,

--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>