| To: | Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: request_module while holding rtnl semaphore |
| From: | Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:10:41 +0100 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041110010113.GJ31969@postel.suug.ch> |
| References: | <41899DCF.3050804@trash.net> <E1CQDcP-0003ff-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20041109161126.376f755c.davem@davemloft.net> <20041110010113.GJ31969@postel.suug.ch> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041008 Debian/1.7.3-5 |
Thomas Graf wrote: Sounds reasonable for the sch_api.c and cls_api.c case but will get very nasty for act_api as you noted and any further sub layers that might be added in the future. (The classifier I'm working on is such a case.) Can you please show an example of a case where this is needed ? Just to help me understand. Regards Patrick |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: request_module while holding rtnl semaphore, Thomas Graf |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: request_module while holding rtnl semaphore, Herbert Xu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: request_module while holding rtnl semaphore, Thomas Graf |
| Next by Thread: | Re: request_module while holding rtnl semaphore, Thomas Graf |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |