| To: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 3657] New: downed interfaces acting as aliases |
| From: | Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:28:47 -0700 |
| Cc: | akpm@xxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, mbm@xxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041029000651.6fd7360f.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Organization: | Candela Technologies |
| References: | <20041028234649.2d4ed3b8.akpm@osdl.org> <20041028234502.203b42c3.davem@davemloft.net> <4181ED02.1060501@candelatech.com> <20041029000651.6fd7360f.davem@davemloft.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 |
David S. Miller wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:10:58 -0700 People hate it that when there's a decision of whether to reply to something or not, we do whatever we can to reply to packets we receive if we can find a way to do so. This approache increases the likelyhood that two hosts can communicate successfully. I need not remind people about how much people dislike our default ARP behavior :-) but it is done that way for the same reason.
Since you finally accepted the arp fixup, maybe you'd at least let in a flag to change the default behaviour of downed interfaces too? Ben -- Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] ipv4/ipv6 forwarding check, Herbert Xu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 3657] New: downed interfaces acting as aliases, Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 3657] New: downed interfaces acting as aliases, David S. Miller |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 3657] New: downed interfaces acting as aliases, Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |