| To: | yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH, TAKE 2] [IPV6] XFRM: extract xfrm_lookup() from ip6_dst_lookup() (is Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup) |
| From: | Brian Haley <Brian.Haley@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:21:29 -0400 |
| Cc: | netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20041027.091039.56337914.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Organization: | Linux Open Source Lab |
| References: | <417E5F37.4010501@hp.com> <20041027.004359.62730834.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <417E92D9.1050305@hp.com> <20041027.091039.56337914.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; OSF1 alpha; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021205 |
Because we do not support RFC3542, extra 128bits is definitely correct. 2292 was deprecated by 3542 in May 2003, when do we plan on supporting it? I am willing to do this update, just please tell me the way you want me to go about it. Thanks, -Brian |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH][ATM]: don't leak skb on as_indicate failure; don't wakeup twice on as_close, chas williams (contractor) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [2.6.10-rc1-bk5] e1000 broken badly on IBM T42, Lee Revell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH, TAKE 2] [IPV6] XFRM: extract xfrm_lookup() from ip6_dst_lookup() (is Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 |
| Next by Thread: | Add ability to receive and transmit ethernet frames with bad CRC (e1000), Ben Greear |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |