netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets

To: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve behaviour of Netlink Sockets
From: Pablo Neira <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 03:19:12 +0200
Cc: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040923120707.GB32624@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <1095633569.1047.107.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040919231734.GA10124@gondor.apana.org.au> <1095647944.1046.206.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040920025802.GA11567@gondor.apana.org.au> <1095683660.1047.254.camel@jzny.localdomain> <414F1E12.6010808@eurodev.net> <20040922000503.GA13218@gondor.apana.org.au> <4150E7E5.2000001@eurodev.net> <20040922045239.GA19573@gondor.apana.org.au> <1095854920.1047.64.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040923120707.GB32624@gondor.apana.org.au>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5
Hi Herbert,

Herbert Xu wrote:

On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 08:08:40AM -0400, jamal wrote:


Since netlink is being used for a lot of things now, it may be time to
obsolete those assumptions.



I'm not against changes. But so far I haven't seen anything concrete
about what these new things are yet :)



Nothing mysterious :), people are willing to put more and more things in kernel space, so I wanted to evaluate netlink sockets as a method to pass information from kernel to user space and vice-versa.


I think that, instead of putting all the things in kernel space, a kernel component can provide an API to user space programs to interact with them, so I wanted to evaluate them to figure out what they could do and what they could't do at this moment. I can also focus this to component replication.

regards,
Pablo

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>