netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] NETIF_F_LLTX for devices 2

from [Jeff Garzik] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NETIF_F_LLTX for devices 2
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:06:51 -0400
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1095010469.2344.215.camel@jzny.localdomain>
References: <E1C4wYe-0005qT-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au> <20040908072408.GI27886@wotan.suse.de> <1094629677.1089.155.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040908134713.1bcd46d3.davem@davemloft.net> <1094823215.1121.129.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040911142116.GL4431@wotan.suse.de> <1094933731.2343.109.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040911174535.2acbb957.davem@davemloft.net> <20040912100114.GB11484@havoc.gtf.org> <20040912102529.GA27096@wotan.suse.de> <20040912161604.GA23366@havoc.gtf.org> <1095010469.2344.215.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803
jamal wrote: 
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 12:16, Jeff Garzik wrote:


Thanks, but still need a patch for return value constants, otherwise you
are compounding rather than addressing a current problem.


Something along the lines of attached patch? 

Yep, thanks, ACK.

        Jeff



[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Support for wccp version 1 and 2 in ip_gre.c, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  Re: generic 802.11 stack, Jeff Garzik
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] NETIF_F_LLTX for devices 2, jamal
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] NETIF_F_LLTX for devices 2, David S. Miller
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]