Re: [PATCH 2.6] 2/2: Fix NAT helper locking

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>]

David S. Miller wrote:

> Applied both patches, but the first had serious offsets
> and the second had to be applied by hand due to rejects
> against the current 2.6.x sources.
>
> Ummm... wow what ancient tree did you patch against
> Harald?  The tree you patched against didn't even have the
> skb_header_pointer() changes in it, that's caveman
> era :-)  That's what caused the rejects.
>  
My fault, I put the patches into patch-o-matic about two or
three weeks ago and didn't expect they wouldn't apply anymore
so quickly :)

> Anyways, I merged it all in cleanly.
Thanks.

Patrick