netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal

from [Patrick McHardy] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:06:36 +0200
Cc: dlstevens@xxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxx, laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, okir@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040829125708.5aa70469.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <412A8FB5.4080700@trash.net> <OFE08A3DF5.09BCA1C4-ON88256EFA.00806C05-88256EFA.0080E98F@us.ibm.com> <20040828231529.051a73cc.davem@davemloft.net> <4132303C.2060807@trash.net> <20040829125708.5aa70469.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 Debian/1.6-5 
David S. Miller wrote:

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 21:36:28 +0200
Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Attached. The first patch still crashed, we need to prevent new
fragments from getting queued after the queue is flushed until the
hook in unregistered.



While we're doing this, is your patch similar to one of the two
original ones that Olaf Kirch posted? I want to give him proper
attribution, in whatever form is reasonable, that's all.


It is based on his second patch. He didn't sign off, otherwise I just
would have kept his Signed-off-by: line.

Regards
Patrick


[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal, David S. Miller
Next by Date:  [PATCH][0/4] b44: Cleanup and bcm47xx support, Florian Schirmer
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Prevent crash on ip_conntrack removal, Patrick McHardy
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]