Andi Kleen wrote:
On 07 Apr 2004 08:24:19 -0400
jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The patch does look clean and attractive. I havent had time toi play
with it myself - but given the way gettimeofday has been torturing me
i will at some point. Also if you have time a 2.4.x patch would be
Thanks. All feedback I received so far was positive. I hope DaveM will
merge it soon. I don't have plans to work on 2.4 anymore.
I finally got around to working with 2.6, and I ran into the
new timestamp code. I would like to be able to have timestamps
even though I do not have a socket structure (I am using a kernel
module to grab all frames)...
How would you feel about either exporting the netstamp_needed variable
or offering a method that explicitly incremented or decremented the
use count?
Thanks,
Ben
-Andi
--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
|