Re: [RFC] Wireless extensions rethink

[Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 02:26:20PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Note that the above is only a first step.  Through the standard Linux 
> > development process -- evolution -- each hook can be pared down to 
> > precisely what each call needs.  The above allows for a quick transition 
> > of drivers, while keeping them working.
> >
> > 	Jeff
>
>
>         Have you looked at the patch I sent you ? In which way does it
> fails to meet your need ?


The three major problems I listed in a previous email are still 
present...  Also there is a fourth -- WE doesn't work 100% when you have 
a 32-bit userland and a 64-bit kernel.

        Jeff