| To: | Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Use RCU for fib_rules |
| From: | Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:20:56 -0800 |
| Cc: | "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paul McKenney <Paul.McKenney@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20040331112839.02e8d4c2@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> |
| References: | <20040331112839.02e8d4c2@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 |
Stephen Hemminger wrote: The IP forwarding rules, uses rwlock when it could use RCU. Don't know if this would help or hurt the recent discussions about large rulesets and DOS attacks.
Any benchmarks or perf tests that quantify the gain here? thanks, Nivedita |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RFC] Use RCU for fib_rules, Stephen Hemminger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: fealnx oopses (with [PATCH]), Denis Vlasenko |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFC] Use RCU for fib_rules, Stephen Hemminger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Use RCU for fib_rules, Stephen Hemminger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |