netdev
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy checks

from [Patrick McHardy] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy checks
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:24:05 +0100
Cc: herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040318221904.45011167.davem@redhat.com>
References: <20040308110331.GA20719@gondor.apana.org.au> <404C874D.4000907@trash.net> <20040308115858.75cdddca.davem@redhat.com> <4059CF27.4030803@trash.net> <20040318221904.45011167.davem@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1 
David S. Miller wrote:

Other than the minor comments I've made the most unhappy I am
with the input patch, and you agree it's grotty too.  Let's look
for a better solution, perhaps with new top-level SKB state,
and then we can put all of your work in after you're made the other
minor fixes I've asked for as well.


I'm going to make the changes you suggested. Can you please explain what
you imagine with the new top-level skb state ?

Regards
Patrick

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [RFC, PATCH 3/5]: netfilter+ipsec - input hooks, Patrick McHardy
Next by Date:  Re: [RFC, PATCH 3/5]: netfilter+ipsec - input hooks, Patrick McHardy
Previous by Thread:  Re: [RFC, PATCH 5/5]: netfilter+ipsec - policy checks, David S. Miller
Next by Thread:  Xeon smp performance, satya srikanth
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]