netdev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: ip_route_me_harder -> xfrm_lookup

To: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ip_route_me_harder -> xfrm_lookup
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:31:06 +0100
Cc: herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20040308115858.75cdddca.davem@redhat.com>
References: <20040308110331.GA20719@gondor.apana.org.au> <404C874D.4000907@trash.net> <20040308115858.75cdddca.davem@redhat.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1
David S. Miller wrote:
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 15:46:37 +0100
Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I have been working on a set of patches for IPsec+Netfilter, the latest set has been posted to netfilter-devel last week. They will go in patch-o-matic for testing soon, but I will post them to netdev later today, so we won't waste time testing patches before Dave is fine with them.


Regardless, and I look forward to your work, Herbert's patch is
absolutely correct so I'm going to apply it for now.

In fact, your work is less likely to be 2.6.4 material I imagine :)
So best to get Herbert's simpler fix in for now.


Sorry for the late reply. You're right of course, Herbert's patch is best for now. The following five mails contain what I've currently got, it's still rough, but I hope you have some suggestions how to avoid some ugly things.

Best regards
Patrick


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>