| To: | jt@xxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] Intersil Prism54 wireless driver |
| From: | Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 10 Mar 2004 12:58:28 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxx, Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20040310175200.GA9531@bougret.hpl.hp.com> |
| References: | <20040304023524.GA19453@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <20040310165548.A24693@infradead.org> <20040310172114.GA8867@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <404F5097.4040406@pobox.com> <20040310175200.GA9531@bougret.hpl.hp.com> |
| Sender: | netdev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703 |
Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
Yes, it would be good to end the cycle of re-implementing 802.11 over and over again ;-) So here is my suggested plan: * I merge prism54 upstream * I create wireless-2.6 queue * somebody (you, Jouni(sp?)) submits HostAP to me * I merge HostAP * submit rtnetlink patches to me * start working on generic 802.11 stack in wireless-2.6 queue * at the same time, migrate away from iw_handler to "wireless_ops" (i.e. something like ethtool_ops) * once things have stabilized again, merge upstream I'm not sure about the order of the last few steps, you know better than I what dependencies exist. Jeff |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] Intersil Prism54 wireless driver, Jean Tourrilhes |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: linux-wireless mailing list, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] Intersil Prism54 wireless driver, Jean Tourrilhes |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 2.6] Intersil Prism54 wireless driver, James Ketrenos |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |